In re Uber Techs., Inc. Passenger Sexual Assault Litig.
Citation:2025 23-03084 (N.D. Cal. 2025)
Summary:The Defendants' motion for relief from a previous order requiring the production of Flack data was denied by the Court, affirming the relevance and importance of the data in the legal proceedings.
Court:United States District Court, N.D. California
Date decided:
Judge:Breyer, Charles R.
IN RE: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PASSENGER SEXUAL ASSAULT LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL CASES MDL No. 3084 United States District Court, N.D. California Filed September 12, 2025 Breyer, Charles R., United States District Judge ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER REGARDING JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER CONCERNING FLACK DATA Re: Dkt. No. 3878 After considering Defendants’ dkt. 3878 Motion for Relief from Judge Cisneros’s dkt. 3848 Order Regarding the Joint Discovery Letter Concerning Flack Data, the Court concludes that Judge Cisneros exercised sound judgement in requiring production of the Flack data. The Court agrees with Judge Cisneros that the requested discovery is appropriate given the significant relevance of Uber’s incident rates information to Plaintiffs’ case and in light of the new evidence gathered at the July 23, 2025 deposition of Hannah Nilles. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Relief is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.