ELIZABETH DE COSTER, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant DEBORAH FRAME-WILSON, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant Case No. 2:20-cv-00424-RSM, Case No. 2:21-cv-00693-RSM United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle Filed July 19, 2023 Counsel Steve W. Berman, Barbara A. Mahoney, HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP, Seattle, WA, Anne F. Johnson (pro hac vice), HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP, Brooklyn, NY, Zina G. Bash (pro hac vice), KELLER POSTMAN LLC, Austin, TX, Warren D. Postman (pro hac vice), Albert Y. Pak (pro hac vice), KELLER POSTMAN LLC, Washington DC, Jessica Beringer (pro hac vice), Jason A. Zweig (pro hac vice), KELLER POSTMAN LLC, Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the proposed Classes. Derek W. Loeser, KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P., Seattle, WA, Alicia Cobb, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, Seattle, WA, Steig D. Olson (pro hac vice), David D. LeRay (pro hac vice), Nic V. Siebert (pro hac vice), Maxwell P. Deabler-Meadows (pro hac vice), QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, New York, NY, Adam B. Wolfson (pro hac vice), QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Interim Executive Committee for Plaintiffs and the proposed Classes. John A. Goldmark, MaryAnn Almeida, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP, Seattle, WA, Karen L. Dunn (pro hac vice), William A. Isaacson (pro hac vice), Amy J. Mauser (pro hac vice), Martha L. Goodman (pro hac vice), Kyle Smith (pro hac vice), PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, D.C., Attorneys for Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. Martinez, Ricardo S., United States District Judge STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER RELATING TO DATA STORAGE The parties, by and through their counsel, stipulate and agree as follows. 1. The parties have met and conferred about the logistics regarding the transfer of large electronic files with respect to Amazon’s forthcoming data production. 2. The parties contemplate that Plaintiffs will store data produced in these matters in an Amazon Web Services (“AWS”) S3 storage space. 3. Plaintiffs’ experts contemplate performing analyses on such data within that storage space. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, and the Parties ask the Court to order, that: a. Amazon personnel with responsibility for this litigation shall not access or view that AWS S3 storage space, except to upload data to it, nor will they monitor Plaintiffs’ storage space to obtain information about how Plaintiffs are putting data to use for purposes of litigation analyses; b. If, despite their forbearance, Amazon personnel with responsibility for this litigation nonetheless obtain such information, Amazon’s counsel shall promptly notify Plaintiffs’ counsel; and c. The data will otherwise be subject to Amazon’s standard data and privacy protections and procedures. DATED this 18th day of July, 2023. ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 19th day of July, 2023.