Twitter, Inc. v. Musk

Citation: 2022 WL 3592549 (Del. Ch. 2022)
Summary: The court ordered the plaintiff to collect, review, and produce documents from Kayvon Beykpour and the 41 custodians to which the plaintiff had already agreed. The court also determined that ESI was important to the case and must be collected, reviewed, and produced in order to ensure a fair and just outcome.
Court: Court of Chancery of Delaware
Date decided: August 15, 2022
Judge: McCormick, Kathaleen St. J.
TWITTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. Elon R. MUSK, X Holdings I, Inc., and X Holdings II, INC., Defendants C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM Court of Chancery of Delaware August 15, 2022 McCormick, Kathaleen St. J., Chancellor ORDER RESOLVING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL CUSTODIANS *1 Having reviewed the defendants’ letter dated August 9, 2022, and the plaintiff's letter dated August 11, 2022, it is hereby ordered that the plaintiff is required to collect, review, and produce documents from Kayvon Beykpour. The plaintiff is not required to collect, review, or produce documents from any other of the defendants’ proposed 22 additional custodians. The plaintiff need only collect, review, and produce documents from the 41 custodians to which plaintiff has agreed to date and Mr. Beykpour.