Cheryl CORY, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE CARDEN INTERNATIONAL CIRCUS, INC., Defendant CIVIL ACTION No. 4:13-CV-760 United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division Signed April 06, 2016 Counsel Spencer Paul Browne, Reyes Bartolomei Browne, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff. Clinton V. Cox, IV, Justin Neal Bryan, Fee Smith Sharp & Vitullo, LLP, Dallas, TX, for Defendant. Clark, Ron, United States District Judge ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE *1 Before the court is George Carden International Circus, Inc.'s (“Defendant”) Motion in Limine. (DOC. # 95). Plaintiff Cheryl Cory timely responded. (DOC. # 116). The court's rulings are set out in the attached chart. Any motion to which the other party did not respond is agreed and deemed granted. As always in this court, the grant of a motion in limine is reciprocal. If one side cannot introduce some piece of evidence without approaching the bench, neither can the other side. The court does not invite a re-hash of every ruling, but if counsel believes in good faith that evidence becomes relevant, say for impeachment, or an opponent “opens the door” that issue should be brought to the court's attention outside the presence of the jury. So ordered and signed on Apr 6, 2016 Rulings on Defendant's Motions in Limine Cheryl Cory v. George Carden International Circus, Inc. (4:13-CV-760)